Open Letter to the Catholic Bishops
Posted on September 27, 2021 Mark
Christ’s faithful are at liberty to make
known their needs,
especially their spiritual needs, and their wishes to the Pastors of the
Church.
They have the right, indeed at times the duty,
in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position,
to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters
which concern the good of the Church.
They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s
faithful,
but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals,
show due reverence to their Pastors,
and take into account both
the common good and dignity of individuals.
—Code of Canon Law,
212
DEAR Catholic Bishops,
After a year and a half of living in a state of “pandemic”, I am compelled
by the undeniable scientific data and testimony of individuals, scientists, and
doctors to beg the hierarchy of the Catholic Church to reconsider its
widespread support for “public health measures” that are, in fact, gravely
endangering public health. As society is being divided between the “vaccinated”
and “unvaccinated” — with the latter suffering everything from exclusion from
society to the loss of income and livelihood — it is shocking to see some
shepherds of the Catholic Church encouraging this new medical apartheid.
There are seven basic premises the
Church has apparently accepted as scientific fact that are, in fact,
pseudo-science at best. I will address each of these below. Although I am
presently a lay evangelist within the Church, my professional background is a
former television reporter with CTV Edmonton in Canada. As such, I have
returned to my journalistic roots of late in hopes of piercing through the
intense censorship and cancel-culture that has deprived the faithful and world
at large of critical information that is a matter of life and death — a matter indeed
of “the common good.” The American novelist Upton Sinclair once said, “It is
foolish to be convinced without evidence, but it is equally foolish to refuse
to be convinced by real evidence.”
Before I address these seven premises, there is one underlying theme that
has been accepted by society at large that has done tremendous damage. And that
is the novel idea that a perfectly healthy person is somehow a viral threat.
Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA, is probably the foremost expert
in the world today on the pandemic response and the most cited doctor in the
National Library of Medicine. He stated recently:
The
virus is not spread asymptomatically. Only sick people give it to other people. —Dr. Peter
6:32; interview, Gab TV
One of the world’s most renowned immunologists agrees:
…it
was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have COVID-19 without
any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any
symptoms whatsoever. —Professor Beda M. Stadler, PhD, former
director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern in
Switzerland; Weltwoche
(World Week) on June 10th, 2020; cf. backtoreason.medium.com
The former Vice President and Chief Scientist of vaccine manufacturer
Pfizer, no less, states flatly that such a premise is a complete fabrication.
Asymptomatic
transmission: the concept a perfectly well person can represent a respiratory
virus threat to another person; that was invented about a year ago — never been
mentioned before in the industry… It’s not possible to have a body full of
respiratory virus to the point that you’re an infectious source and for you not
to have symptoms… It’s not true that people without symptoms are a strong
respiratory virus threat. —April 11th, 2021, interview
on The Last
American Vagabond
Hence it follows that masking the healthy,[1]
social distancing, and locking down entire healthy populations rather than
focused health protocols and quarantining the sick, have little basis in
science. The PCR test, used globally to determine whether someone has COVID,
has produced so many “false-positives”[2]
— over 90% according to the New York Times [3] — that it has been
condemned by several European courts[4]
and has been called “criminal” by several leading scientists.[5] Combining over a thousand
hours in research, I have addressed this astonishing departure from science in
a new documentary called Following the
Science?
Not long ago, Pope Francis stated:
I
believe that ethically everyone must take the vaccine. It is the ethical choice
because it is about your life but also the lives of others. I do not understand
why some say that this could be a dangerous vaccine. If the doctors are presenting
this to you as a thing that will go well and doesn’t have any special dangers,
why not take it? There is a suicidal denialism that I would not know how to
explain, but today, people must take the vaccine. —POPE
FRANCIS, interview for Italy’s TG5
news program, January 19th, 2021; ncronline.com
Unfortunately, this statement, which is refuted by the emerging data, is the
very basis for allowing not only segregation to return en masse within
society but has potentially led to the injury and deaths of scores, as I’ll
explain.
I write this letter most especially in the name of all the priests and laity
who have reached out to me, pressured by their bishops to participate in a
medical programme that violates their conscience…
Premise I: This is a vaccine
The first premise the Church is apparently operating from is that this is a
“vaccine.” It is no little thing that the mRNA injections are not
vaccines in any traditional sense. According to the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), it is a “gene therapy”.
Currently,
mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. —Moderna’s
Registration Statement, pg. 19, sec.gov
This is a technology that has never made it to market after nearly twenty
years of research because of its lethality in animal trials.[6] It only found “emergency
authorization use” during this current declared pandemic. Why is this
important? There are no long-term studies of this current “vaccine”, a process
which normally takes 10-15 years before being mass distributed. Second, the
clinical trials of these mRNA injections are not slated for completion until
2023.[7] This means all the
trial and safety data are still being collected while the product is
being injected into millions of arms. This, by very definition, makes this an experimental
injection. This has been confirmed by Moderna.[8]
The CEO of Moderna admits that this technology is “actually hacking the
software of life.”[9] It is
startling, then, that the Church has seemingly thrown her support behind a
completely novel, untested technology with radical potential for misuse.[10] The Catechism of the Catholic
Church is clear:
Research or experimentation on the human being cannot legitimate
acts that are in themselves contrary to the dignity of persons and to the moral
law. The subjects’ potential consent does not justify such acts.
Experimentation on human beings is not morally legitimate if it exposes the
subject’s life or physical and psychological integrity to disproportionate or
avoidable risks. Experimentation on human beings does not conform to the
dignity of the person if it takes place without the informed consent of the
subject or those who legitimately speak for him. —n. 2295
Premise II: Ethically everyone must take this “vaccine”
Since the mRNA gene therapies are experimental, any coercion or “mandate” to
force someone to be injected with this technology is a direct violation of Catholic
teaching as well as the Nuremberg Code. This Code was developed in 1947 to
protect patients from medical experimentation, stating as its first declaration
that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is
absolutely essential.” [11]
Hence, the Holy Father’s statement that “that ethically everyone must
take the vaccine” is in conflict with this basic principle of international
law. Second, it is in contradiction with the Congregration for the Doctrine of
the Faith’s own guidelines:
At
the same time, practical reason makes evident that vaccination is not, as a
rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary. — “Note on the
morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines”, n. 6; vatican.va
Hence, it is deeply troubling to have seen your fellow Bishop in Moncton,
New Brunswick briefly threaten to withhold the sacraments from those not
“doubly vaccinated”.[12]
However, we understand this may already be the case in Malaysia. Nonetheless,
it is clear that several bishops and cardinals are forcing their diocesan staff
to be injected — or face possible termination, which is tantamount to violating
the “voluntary consent of the human subject.”
Premise III: The “vaccine” doesn’t have any “special dangers”
In the CDF’s guidelines, it explicitly states:
We
do not intend to judge the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, although
ethically relevant and necessary, as this evaluation is the responsibility of
biomedical researchers and drug agencies. —n. 1, vatican.va
A year and a half into the pandemic and many months into an unprecedented
“mass vaccination” of the global population, there is enough data to contradict
the Pope’s surprising disclaimer. For one, the animal trials from the very
beginning were already a “signal” of potential “special dangers” with this
therapy.
However, now that we are well into the human trials, the early data reveals
an unprecedented and disturbing picture. In the United States, VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting
System) established to collect information on vaccine injuries, reveals that
nearly 15,000 people have reportedly died after receiving the injection; 19,210
have been permanently injured; and over 800,00 have reported some kind of adverse
reaction varying in severity.[13]
For perspective, Dr. Peter McCullough, who has worked on drug safety
commissions, notes that:
A
typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box
warning, saying it may cause death. And then at about 50 deaths it’s pulled off
the market. —interview with Alex Newman, The New American, April 27th,
2021
During the 1976 Swine Flu pandemic, they attempted to vaccinate 55 million
Americans, but the drive was suddenly dropped. “The program was killed at 25
deaths,” says Dr. McCullough.[14]
On July 16, 1999, the CDC recommended that healthcare providers suspend the use
of the licensed RotaShield – a rotavirus vaccine – after only 15 cases of
intussusception (bowel obstruction) were reported in VAERS.[15]
Moreover, Dr. McCullough notes a Harvard
study that found only about 1% of actual adverse reactions are reported to
VAERS.[16] That means the
aforementioned injuries and deaths may be exponentially higher.
Finally, Dr. McCullough himself states:
We
have independent evaluations suggesting 86% [of deaths] is related to the
vaccine [and] is far beyond anything that is acceptable… It’s going to go down
in history as the most dangerous biological-medicinal product rollout in human
history. —July
21st, 2021, Stew Peters
Show, rumble.com at
17:38
By contrast, in Europe, the official database EudraVigilance reports that,
as of September 11th, 2021, some 24,526 deaths have occurred after injection,
and over 2.3 million have been injured.[17]
And the WHO’s database using the search term “COVID-19 vaccine” returns over 2
million injuries.[18] This is
extraordinary, and why Dr. McCullough has called for an immediate stop to the
drug programme. In fact, Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology,
has recently signed The Physician’s Declaration along with 3000
other doctors and scientists, accusing COVID policy-makers of potential “crimes
against humanity.”[19] The
reason for the injuries and deaths been ascertained and discussed now by
numerous high-level scientists (see footnote). [20]
In a pointed address to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD,
who has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology,
bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, and received numerous awards and the
Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate, stated:
Don’t
you know of the dangers of these vaccines? If so, why not? It’s your damn duty
to find out. Same with the authorities; same, by the way, with the BBC — once
the Great British Broadcasting Corporation… Now Boris’ or Bill [Gates’]
Broadcasting Corporation. Shame on you, shame on you. —Dr. Sucharit
Bhakdi, MD; Oracle Films, rumble.com
If bishops are going to mandate that their staff and priests are to be
injected against their consciences, and remain silent while thousands of their
parishioners are fired from their jobs in health care and elsewhere… it would
seem there is a moral obligation, at bare minimum, to assure that the hierarchy
has carefully reviewed the safety data first.
Premise IV: There is no alternative
The CDF states:
Those
who, however, for reasons of conscience, refuse vaccines produced with cell
lines from aborted fetuses, must do their utmost to avoid, by other
prophylactic means and appropriate behavior, becoming vehicles for the
transmission of the infectious agent. —Ibid. n. 5
Since the injections being used in this mass “vaccination” campaign utilized
aborted fetal cell lines in order to develop them, the CDF gave specific
guidelines as to when they would be permissible, if at all. Among other things,
the “Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines” states:
In
the absence of other means to stop or even prevent the epidemic, the common good may
recommend vaccination, especially to protect the weakest and most exposed. —n. 5, vatican.va
According to “Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment
trials of Ivermectin in COVID-19, [there] have found large, statistically
significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to
viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis
trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the
regular use of Ivermectin.”[21]
In fact, one of that study’s authors testified before a US Senate Committee
hearing:
Mountains
of data have emerged from many centers and countries around the world, showing
the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of
this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick. —Dr. Pierre
Kory, M.D., December 8th, 2020; cnsnews.com
The Nobel Prize nominee Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, MD, an advisor to several
governments and published in top peer-reviewed journals, reports a “99%
survival of high-risk Covid-19 patients” by placing them on similar protocols
utilizing Ivermectin or Quercitin to deliver zinc to cells to combat the viral
proteins.[22]
In his address to the UK government, Dr. Sucharit declares:
The
truth is there are excellent medicines: safe, efficacious, cheap — that, as Dr.
Peter McCullough has been saying for months now, will save the lives of 75% of
the elderly with pre-existing disease, and that reduces the lethality of this
virus to below
the flu. —Oracle films;
:01 mark; rumble.com
Hence, the moral argument for taking these abortion-tainted injections
completely falls apart. Moreover, that these life-saving remedies are being
censored should cause a collective outcry from all quarters of the Church as
family members, religious and priests are unnecessarily dying and Intensive
Care Units (ICU’s) unnecessarily strained!
Premise V: Vaccination is the only valid means of building “immunity”
In 2020, the World Health Organization quietly but significantly changed the
definition of “herd immunity”:
‘Herd
immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for
vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold
of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting
people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. —October
15th, 2020; who.int
That monumental statement should have raised a loud and uniform protest
among Catholic ethicists and scientists (but perhaps the censorship is simply
too great, and they are unaware…?). Nonetheless, this definition strikes at the
very heart of God’s creation, suggesting that man’s natural immunity is somehow
now useless, and that every man, woman and child must henceforth be injected when,
how, and with what the government dictates. This is flagrantly
anti-science and the very definition of medical tyranny. On the contrary,
Harvard Professor Dr. Martin Kulldorff, PhD, states:
What
we know is that if you have had COVID, you have very good immunity — not only
for the same variant, but also for other variants. And even for other types,
cross-immunity, for other types of coronaviruses.—Dr. Martin
Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, Epoch Times
And Dr. McCullough states:
You
can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it
better. —Dr.
Peter McCullough, March 10th, 2021; cf. documentary Following the Science?
He cites new data out of the United Kingdom that shows “nine out of every 10
people in the United Kingdom between the ages of 16 and 24 already have
antibodies to protect themselves against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19)…
According to the estimates, 86.9 percent of young people in Wales have COVID-19
antibodies. In Northern Ireland, the number is 87.2 percent. In Scotland and
England, this number increases slightly to 88.7 percent. The presence of
coronavirus antibodies among such a high percentage of young people all over
the U.K. suggests that many have already been infected by COVID-19 and have
recovered from it… In Mumbai, India, nearly 90 percent of the residents of the
city already have COVID-19 antibodies, according to a survey that was just
released on Friday.”[23]
However, with several bishops and even cardinals beginning to push “vaccine”
mandates, it seems this basic fact of Creation and a foundational tenet of
immunology is being ignored, even by the Church. In fact, one Archbishop went
so far as to declare: “If you don’t want to be vaccinated, you are actually a
sinner because you will become a source of the disease for other people.”[24] This is so far from actual
science, so distant from any sound medical or moral argument, that such
statements are scandalous, embarrassing, and causing more division and
demonization of perfectly healthy and immune people. Says one Canadian priest,
thankfully:
One
thing I do know is that we cannot participate in any enforcement by government
of any marking system that identifies clean and unclean leper and non-leper,
vaccinated or non-vaccinated; to do that would be for us to surrender to the
powers of this world, that which only rests with God. —Fr. Stefano
Penna, St. Paul’s Co-Cathedral, Saskatoon, Canada; Sept. 19th, 2021; lifesitenews.com
It should be well-noted that the “deniers”,[25]
as Pope Francis sadly called some of his own Cardinals who are
“vaccine-hesitant”, are not uneducated, selfish holdouts. Rather, a recent
study found that the most “vaccine-hesitant” are those with PhD’s.[26] How does belittling, mocking, and
disparaging those who, based on their careful research and an informed decision
to refuse forced injection, advance any kind of “human” cause? Does the Church
no longer believe in the precept of “informed conscience”?[27]
Moreover, a stunning irony emerges in that the mRNA vaccines do not and never
were designed to prevent the transmission of the virus.
The
studies [on the mRNA inoculations] aren’t designed to assess transmission. They
don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this
point in time. —Dr.
Larry Corey oversees the National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 “vaccine”
trials; November 20th, 2020; medscape.com; cf. primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine
They
were tested with an outcome of severe disease — not preventing infection. —U.S.
Surgeon General Jerome Adams, Good
Morning America, December 14th, 2020; dailymail.co.uk
That the hierarchy has been misled in this regard by a small but powerful
sector in the global medical complex is unfortunate. In fact, data rolling in
from countries around the world, most notably the most vaccinated countries of
Israel, the UK, Bermuda, etc. all show that it is the “vaccinated” who are
spreading the virus the most.[28]
If there is any doubt remaining, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky recently
admitted to CNN that the injections simply no longer “prevent transmission”
(which we were told from the beginning that they never did).[29]
So why are Catholic bishops demonizing healthy, unvaccinated individuals
when those who are “vaccinated” are likely going to spread the virus in their
parishes and communities anyway?
Premise VI: COVID-19 is the most pressing health issue
The disease COVID-19 caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2 can be a serious
infection for certain people. According to the CDC, the survival rate for those
under 50 years of age is 99.5%.[30]
Children are more at risk of dying from seasonal influenza than COVID-19.[31] Dr. Robert Malone states, “the
risk associated with this disease is not uniformly distributed” but is “almost
exclusively in the very old and obese, and others with certain preexisting risk
factors.”[32] So while this is a
more serious virus for those in high-risk categories, it has proven not to be
so for the general population.
However, the obsession of governments with COVID-19 alone, with the
endorsement of the Church at the highest level, has created a horrendous gulf
of suffering and injustice elsewhere. Two United Nations agencies have warned
that the unprecedented lockdown of healthy populations could lead to a
“doubling of world poverty” and a further “135 million” to starve to death.[33] It is a tragic irony that while
our Church leaders are calling for equal distribution of these “vaccines”, the
very lockdowns intended to “protect” the poor are killing them. And what about
those losing
their businesses and livelihoods due to prolonged lockdowns? What about
those thousands who are dying because of delayed
surgeries? What about the skyrocketing mental
health issues and potential
explosion of suicides?[34] What about the deaths through a pandemic
of drug abuse? And what about those being forced from their jobs in this
medical apartheid?[35] David Redman,
a former head of the Alberta Emergency Management Agency, writes:
The
Canadian “lockdown” response will kill at least 10 times more than it might
have saved from the actual virus, COVID-19. The unconscionable use of fear
during an emergency, to ensure compliance, has caused a breach in confidence in
government that will last a decade or more. The damage to our democracy will
last at least a generation. —July 2021, page 5, “Canada’s Deadly
Response to COVID-19”
And your fellow bishop, French prelate Marc Aillet warned:
…man
is “one in body and soul”, it is not right to turn physical health into an
absolute value to the point of sacrificing the psychological and spiritual
health of citizens, and in particular to deprive them of freely practicing
their religion, which experience proves to be essential for their equilibrium. Fear is not a good
counsellor: it leads to ill-advised attitudes, it sets people against one
another, it generates a climate of tension and even violence. We may well be on
the verge of an explosion! —Bishop Marc Aillet for the
diocesan magazine Notre
Eglise (“Our Church”), December 2020; countdowntothekingdom.com
Premise VII: a “vaccine passport” is a “health” tool
Scientists around the globe, including the former Vice President of Pfizer,
Dr. Mike Yeadon, are warning that vaccine passports are the end of freedom as
we know it. That the Vatican has now adopted such a tool itself is a scandal as
it deliberately excludes perfectly healthy people, many who are naturally
immune, from participating in society. Already in France and in Columbia, some
people have been blocked from buying groceries.[36]
Two doctors in Alberta, Canada are calling for all unvaccinated to lose
employment, potentially casting thousands of families into destitution.[37] Italy has already suspended all
unvaccinated workers without pay.[38]
Such a medical apartheid is a horrifying spectre spreading across the world,
creating new forms of discrimination, injustice and hardship. Here, the
prescient words of Benedict XVI are already upon us — that an “act of love”,
which is what Pope Francis calls taking this experimental injection, must
always be rooted in truth, o
…without
the guidance of charity in truth, this global force could cause unprecedented
damage and create new divisions within the human family. —Caritas in
Veritate, n. 33
That the Vatican is “setting the example” by initiating so-called “green
passports” is grievous when all things are considered, and inexcusable to those
scientists who are warning of the grave risks to medical and human freedom with
such an unnecessary surveillance system:
Just
take it from me, you don’t need vaccine passports. They provide nothing
whatsoever to you or anyone else in relations to safety. But it will give away,
to whoever controls that database and the rules, complete control over
everything you do. —Dr. Mike Yeadon, from Following the
Science?
58:31 mark
If
they ever come to be, then it’s goodnight to society, goodnight to science,
goodnight to humanity. — Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Ibid; 58:48
I
can’t say it more forcefully enough, this is literaly the end of human liberty
in the West if this plan unfolds as planned. —Dr. Naomi
Wolfe, Ibid; 59:04
LESSONS FROM THE PAST
Given all of the above, it is incomprehensible to many that the Church is
not only silent in the face of these overwhelming injustices taking place in
the name of the “common good” but that we are actively complicit with
the State. Have we not already learned the hard lessons from the past of
participating in the State’s projects of injustice? In Canada, dozens of
churches have been burned to the ground or vandalized this past year for the
Catholic Church’s direct cooperation in residential schools, which in some
places acted in “cultural genocide” of the native way of life under the
government’s funding and watchful eye. How ironic that this September 30th,
2021 will mark National Day for Truth and Reconciliation in Canada… at the very
same time new and grotesque divisions and injustices are enforced by the State and
Church in lockstep.
But perhaps the most applicable example is the Church’s wide acceptance and
even promotion of the pharmaceutical industry’s most prized method of eugenics:
the “birth control pill.” The so-called “Winnipeg Statement” by Canadian
bishops opened the door to a kind of ecclesiastical acceptance and even
participation in the promotion of contraception under the banner of the stated
sophistry:
…that
course which seems right to him, does so in good conscience. —Canadian
Bishops response to Humanae
Vitae; Plenary Assembly held at St. Boniface, Winnipeg, Canada,
Sept 27th, 1968
(Again, the irony of that statement in light of bishops now adopting the
State’s “no jab, no job” discrimination policy, that utterly overrides
individual conscience, is quite stunning.)
As a result of vast portions of the Church ignoring Pope Paul VI’s clear
teaching, and cooperating with “Big Pharma’s” eugenics programme, hundreds of
millions of babies have been killed, Western nations are in a population
decline,[39] and birth control
pills have been linked to breast [40]
and cervical cancer [41] while
others to prostate cancer in men. [42]
The incredible cost to the health care system, not only in dealing with these
physical diseases but the untold mental health issues when parents come to
terms (or not) with having killed their own offspring, are practically
incalculable.[43]
In
the Encyclical letter Laudato ‘si, Pope Francis stated: “the
Church does not presume to settle scientific questions or to replace politics.
But I am concerned to encourage an honest and open debate so that particular
interests or ideologies will not prejudice the common good.”[44] It
should be clear now that neither honest nor open debate, nor freedom from
particular interests or ideologies, has marked this pandemic. Rather,
censorship, control, and manipulation have prevailed as thousands of scientists
and doctors have been threatened, deplatformed, or dismissed for sharing the
very data that you have just read. That the Church is party to this by virtue
of her silence is not only grievous to many of us, but the cost can be counted
literally in lost and destroyed lives. Please, dear shepherds, reject this new
holocaust in the name of truth and science.
Your
servant in Christ,
Mark Mallett
September
27th, 2021
Footnotes
|
Footnotes |
|
|
↑1 |
cf. An article summarizing all the
latest studies on masking: Unmasking
the Facts |
|
↑2 |
|
|
↑3 |
|
|
↑4 |
|
|
↑5 |
|
|
↑6 |
primarydoctor.org; America’s
Frontline Doctors White Paper On Experimental
Vaccines For COVID-19; cf. pfizer.com |
|
↑7 |
|
|
↑8 |
Listen to “Moderna’s Admission”, rumble.com |
|
↑9 |
|
|
↑10 |
cf. Prof. Yuval Harar, for
example, considers humans to be “hackable animals”: rumble.com |
|
↑11 |
Shuster E. Fifty years later:
The significance of the Nuremberg code. New
England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337:1436-1440 |
|
↑12 |
|
|
↑13 |
VAERS;
this website has filtered COVID-19 injections from other vaccines here: openVAERS.com;
we are tracking the numbers independently from several countries here. |
|
↑14 |
read interview here |
|
↑15 |
|
|
↑16 |
The
Lazarus final report |
|
↑17 |
cf. The
Tolls |
|
↑18 |
|
|
↑19 |
|
|
↑20 |
The mRNA injections cause a
person’s cells to create the “spike protein” similar to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
However, rather than staying in the site of the injection, bio-distribution data
has revealed that the spike protein is travelling throughout the entire body,
including to the brain and accumulating in organs, most notably the ovaries.
This is causing massive reports of blood clotting, strokes, myocarditis,
heart failure, rashes, paralysis, seizures, blindness, hair loss, and other
issues reported in VAERS. How the virus uses the spike protein to enter human
cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y Article
on how the Covid19 spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub Japanese
article on how the Pfizer vax is associated with brain hemorrhaging (lending
credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood
brain barrier in some people): https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7 Article
on how AstraZeneca is associated with blood clots in the brain (lending more
credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood
brain barrier in some people): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840 Article
on how the Covid19 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of our platelets
to cause bloodclots: https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7 Article
explaining that blood clots from the spike protein interacting with our
platelets are associated with both COVID-19 infection and vaccination: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648 Article
explains that just the S1 subunit of the spike protein can cause platelets to
clot: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1 Article
with evidence that spike proteins do end up circulating in the blood, when
they’re not supposed to, they’re supposed to be anchored on the cell
membranes: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075 More
evidence that spike proteins do not stay on the cell membranes but end up
circulating in the blood. This study aims to explain the blood clots caused
by the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovector vaccines, they claim that the DNA
isn’t properly spliced and the spike proteins end up in the blood causing
thrombosis when the spikes attach to the ACE2 receptors of the endothelial
cells: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1 Article
on how the spike protein can cause neurodegeneration: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub Journal
article with evidence that the spike protein by itself can damage cells by
binding to ACE2, causing the cells mitochondria to lose their shape and break
apart: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902 Article
on how the spike protein in vaccines can cause cell damage via cell
signaling: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/ Article
that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the release
of soluble IL-6R which acts as a extracellular signal which causes inflammation
(see the first paper for evidence that the spike causes the release of IL-6R
and see the second paper for an explanation of how soluble IL-6R causes
pro-inflamatory extracellular signaling: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/ And https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/ Another
article that Spike protein from covid or the vaccine causes inflammation
through cell signaling, this time there is evidence that the spike protein
causes senescence (premature aging) signals in the cell which attracts
leukocytes that cause inflammation of the cell: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21 Spike
protein by itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory
response: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z |
|
↑21 |
“Review of the Emerging Evidence
Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of
COVID-19”, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov |
|
↑22 |
|
|
↑23 |
Telegram post; September 23rd,
2021 |
|
↑24 |
September 23rd, 2021; ucanews.com |
|
↑25 |
|
|
↑26 |
cf. unherd.com;
see also an article recommended by Dr. Robert Malone: “Acceptable Reasons for
Vaccine Hesitance w/50 Published Medical Journal Sources”, reddit.com |
|
↑27 |
CCC, 1783 |
|
↑28 |
|
|
↑29 |
|
|
↑30 |
|
|
↑31 |
|
|
↑32 |
Discussions with Cardinal Peter
Turkson, churchmilitant.com;
nb. I do not necessarily endorse the other opinions expressed on that website |
|
↑33 |
|
|
↑34 |
Increase of 44%
in suicides in Nepal; Japan
saw more deaths by suicide than COVID in 2020;
see also study;
cf. “Suicide
Mortality and Coronavirus Disease 2019—A Perfect Storm?” |
|
↑35 |
“Thousands of health care workers
to lose jobs”, ktrh.iheart.com |
|
↑36 |
France video: rumble.com;
Columbia: August 2nd, 2021; france24.com |
|
↑37 |
|
|
↑38 |
|
|
↑39 |
cf. firsthings.com |
|
↑40 |
cf. cbsnews.com, nytimes.com |
|
↑41 |
cf. lifesitenews |
|
↑42 |
cf. lifesitenews.com |
|
↑43 |
|
|
↑44 |
n. 188, vatican.va |
No comments:
Post a Comment